Peer Review

Home Forums Junto Online Discussions Peer Review

This topic contains 0 replies, has 1 voice, and was last updated by  Anonymous 4 years, 10 months ago.

Viewing 1 post (of 1 total)
  • Author
  • #11132


    With respect to some questions raised at the Nina Teicholz
    and John Mackey debate, anyone who wants to put their faith
    in peer-reviewed scientific papers should first read the work
    being done by the Stanford University epidemiologist John
    Ioannidis on the reproducibility of results. Or for a general
    summary of the problems see for example,

    Unreliable research: Trouble at the lab

Viewing 1 post (of 1 total)

You must be logged in to reply to this topic.

Next post: