Peer Review

Home Forums Junto Online Discussions Peer Review

This topic contains 0 replies, has 1 voice, and was last updated by  JayEm 2 years, 9 months ago.

Viewing 1 post (of 1 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • #11132

    JayEm
    Participant

    With respect to some questions raised at the Nina Teicholz
    and John Mackey debate, anyone who wants to put their faith
    in peer-reviewed scientific papers should first read the work
    being done by the Stanford University epidemiologist John
    Ioannidis on the reproducibility of results. Or for a general
    summary of the problems see for example,

    Unreliable research: Trouble at the lab

    • This topic was modified 2 years, 9 months ago by  JayEm. Reason: link didn't show up
Viewing 1 post (of 1 total)

You must be logged in to reply to this topic.

Next post: